|
1
|
- Training for 2003
v1.2 – 10/29/02
2002 Training Dates
11/3 (Reston Rehearsal
Hall)
- 11/10 (Tapestry – 206 N. Washington)
- 11/14 (St. Marks Players)
- 11/17 (Rockville Little Theatre)
|
|
2
|
- THANK YOU! Thank you for volunteering to be a WATCH judge for 2003.
- How many of you have been a judge before (primary or alternate)?
- How many of those have been to a training session before?
- How many new judges?
|
|
3
|
- Introductions
- What’s New
- Judging
- Why you were selected
- Matrix of assignments
- E-mail and the Web
- Tickets and Reservations
- Using Alternates
- Adjudication Criteria
- The Ballot
- Where to send it.
- Do’s and Don’ts
- Special Circumstances
- Reminders and Dates
- Q&A
- Summary
|
|
4
|
- Adjudication Coordinator for 2003
- Suzanne Fehl
- Phone: 301-645-0001 & 202-781-3009
- E-mail: FehlSL@navsea.navy.mil
- Suzanne is returning as the coordinator for a second year.
|
|
5
|
- Founded in 1999, adjudication began in 2000.
- The Washington Area Theatre Community Honors (WATCH) is an organization
founded for the adjudication and presentation of annual awards
recognizing artistic and technical excellence in community theatre
throughout the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, and that these
honors will:
- Foster and encourage the growth of community theater;
- Promote and enhance the image of community theater; and
- Educate and inform the general public about the theatrical
opportunities provided by the member theaters.
|
|
6
|
- WATCH Charter Member Groups & Current Reps
- The Arlington Players (TAP) – John Monnett
- Castaways Repertory Theatre (CRT) – Mary-Anne Sullivan
- Elden Street Players (ESP) – Todd Huse
- Hard Bargain Players (HBP) – Bob Bartlett
- Little Theatre of Alexandria (LTA) – Chris Kirk
- Montgomery Playhouse (MP) – Judy Mayer
- Port Tobacco Players (PTP) – Suzanne Fehl
- Prince William Little Theatre (PWLT) – Don Wilson
- Reston Community Players (RCP) – Sue Pinkman
- Tapestry Theatre Company (TTC) –
Kay Martin
|
|
7
|
- WATCH 2001 Member Groups & Board Reps
- Great Falls Players (GFP) – Emily Besuden
- Silver Spring Stage (SSS) – Leta Hall
- St. Mark’s Players (SMP) – Christopher Tully
|
|
8
|
- WATCH 2002 Member Groups & Board Reps
- Dominion Stage (DS) – Mary Beth Smith-Toomey
- Rockville Little Theatre (RLT) – Seth Ghitelman
- Vienna Theatre Company (VTC) – Angie Anderson
|
|
9
|
- WATCH welcomes new members for 2003
- American Music Stage – Kye-Won Kopko
- Kensington Arts Theatre – April Biechler
- Port City Playhouse – John Downing
- Springfield Community Theatre – Carl Eisen
|
|
10
|
- New Groups in MD and VA.
- No changes to the process or criteria.
- However, for those judges that would like more in-depth criteria
training, the WATCH board is attempting to arrange additional sessions
to deal with elements which are difficult to judge.
|
|
11
|
- Why you were selected
- Matrix of assignments
- Tickets and Reservations
- Using Alternates
- Adjudication Criteria
- The Ballot
- Where to send it.
- Do’s and Don’ts
- Special Circumstances
|
|
12
|
- For your experience in theater.
- On stage and backstage in community theater. We hope you have a background in many
areas of theatrical production.
- And as an audience member of community theater.
- For your support of all community theater.
- Regardless of what company you represent, we expect you to be fair and
unbiased when judging.
- For your sense of responsibility
- We are counting on you to fulfill the commitment you are making to view
and fairly judge the shows assigned to you.
|
|
13
|
- As a judge
- You will be assigned to see 8 to 9 shows during the calendar year of
2003
- Fill out a ballot, scoring every identifiable element.
- Send that ballot to the tabulation mailing address.
- Being a WATCH judge is a full-year commitment
- Regardless of problems at your home theater.
- If you need to be relieved of your commitment, please just ask. We would rather help you out of the
commitment rather than have missed shows.
|
|
14
|
- The computer randomly generates assignments to all of the judges (5 per
company).
- You will not judge shows produced by your “home” company.
- You should not be assigned back-to-back shows in the same “region.”
- Southeast – HBP, PTP,
- Southwest – PWLT, CRT, SCT, AMS
- North – SSS, MP, RLT, KAT
- Central –TAP, LTA, SMP, DS, TTC, PCP
- West – ESP, RCP, VTC, (GFP)
- The “region” factor was implemented in 2001 to cut down on the chances
of a judge having to go a great distance several times in one month.
|
|
15
|
- Next year’s matrix is still being determined, you will have it before
January 1.
- You can also view the current matrix online at http://washingtontheater.org
- The new matrix will be posted online as soon as possible.
- The matrix also provides a breakdown of the judges assigned to see a
show, so the box office can be ready for the reservations.
|
|
16
|
- The WATCH program runs on the internet.
- If you don’t have e-mail, you will be at a disadvantage. You will need to keep in touch with
your theater representative about any reminders and schedule changes.
- Every week (usually mid-week) the Adjudication coordinator sends out
the WATCH Report to all judges (primary, alternates and reps)
- Sample provided
- Starts with important notices and reminders
- What is closing this week
- What is opening this week
- What is continuing this week
- What closed last week
- Looking ahead to future weeks
- General Info
|
|
17
|
- All of the judges/alternates/reps will be added to a list server which
only the Coordinator will be able to see or use.
- You will get a “subscription” notice with your password and web link to
this list service. If your e-mail
address changes, you will be able to unsubscribe the old address and
subscribe with a new address.
- We are very judicious (and protective) with the use of this list. If you receive “test” messages, please
disregard them.
|
|
18
|
- As we go through the rest of the adjudication training you will notice
how much we ask you to just keep us posted via e-mail.
- Why?
- We must have ten judges see a show.
- Your keeping us informed helps us to coordinate alternates and
emergencies.
- Realize this is the only meeting you will be asked to attend. All other communication between you
and the WATCH program will be via e-mail. We hope that communication will be two-way.
|
|
19
|
- The ballot, the criteria, the matrix, the guidelines… all of the
information you receive here at training will be on the website. (even
these training slides)
- A lot of information is already there, but some of it may need to be
updated for the new season.
- If you need information, please check there.
- http://washingtontheater.org
- If you still need more help,
- start with your company representative,
- then the adjudication coordinator,
- then another member of the WATCH board.
|
|
20
|
- Each company is different
- The “Just the Facts” document details how to make reservations at each
company.
- You must make a reservation.
Some of the groups have small houses and cannot “squeeze” you
in.
- Your ticket as a judge is free at all theaters
- Some companies, not all, offer a free, restricted or discounted
companion ticket (also listed on the “Just the Facts” document).
- PLEASE, be kind to the box office staff members.
- The WATCH program will be new to several groups and the box office
staff is often the one that has the biggest adjustment. If you have a problem, contact YOUR
representative and it will be addressed.
|
|
21
|
- Please think ahead.
- Don’t wait to make reservations and risk a sold out performance on the
“only night you could go”
- Please, Do NOT make reservations for closing night.
- Closing night is reserved as an “emergency alternate night”. If you miss a show, we always want to
have closing night to send an alternate in your place
|
|
22
|
- Consider traffic.
- Crossing the Potomac on a Friday night across the Woodrow Wilson bridge
can take an hour.
- I-270 is often jammed on a Friday night.
- Plan to get there 15-30 minutes early.
- Some groups release reserved tickets at curtain time (including any
non-refundable tickets you may have paid for a companion).
- Some groups have “festival seating”.
|
|
23
|
- Make sure you leave extra time for finding a theater that is new to you.
- Always double-check the venue address and directions before you leave,
after all this is community theater and some of our groups change
venues.
- IMPORTANT: E-mail your rep when you make a reservation.
- It lets us know you are aware and on top of your responsibility.
|
|
24
|
- If you know you cannot attend a show…
- If you are in or working on a show you are supposed to judge…
- If you have a conflict of interest…
- If, for any reason, you cannot make an unbiased adjudication of a show
(or element of a show)…
- Ask your company rep to find an alternate to judge the show for you.
- Yes, alternates are for emergencies also, but most of the time, it
didn’t have to be an emergency.
|
|
25
|
- Work with your rep to ensure that the alternate understands the
responsibility being passed to them.
- Provide your alternate with your Judge # and contact the box office if
any changes to reservations need to be made.
- IMPORTANT: E-mail your company rep (and/or adjudication coordinator)
about the change.
|
|
26
|
- Now, what are you looking for when you are sitting in the theater
watching a show?
- The awards can be divided into three types:
- Overall Production (7 awards)
- Technical Elements (11 awards)
- Performances (10 awards)
|
|
27
|
- Of these 28 awards, all of them should be evaluated with three
overriding principles
- Each element should
- Serve the story being told
- Be appropriate to the piece and the presenting space (in context of
director’s vision)
- Be of consistent quality throughout the piece
- Regardless of the judges personal likes and dislikes.
- Judges are encouraged to be familiar with the works that are new to
them.
|
|
28
|
- With the help of several community theater veterans, additional criteria
have been developed for each category.
|
|
29
|
- In judging performances consider:
- Creative:
- Character serves the story and is believable – choices are clear,
appropriate, consistent.
- Technical (stagecraft):
- Maintains focus throughout; projection, diction, dialect (if
applicable) are appropriate; movement, physicality appropriate and
consistent for development of character. Plays well with others.
- Additional consideration of musical performances: Vocal/dance
abilities consistent and appropriate to the character. Able to
maintain focus and character through musical and/or dance numbers as
appropriate to the story.
|
|
30
|
- In addition, you will also be asked to determine the lead and cameo
performances, but we will discuss those distinctions when we get to
filling out the ballot.
|
|
31
|
- When considering technical elements, remember, each element should:
- Serve the story being told
- Be appropriate to the piece and the presenting space (in context of
director’s vision)
- Be of consistent quality throughout the piece
- With the following considerations for each specific element
|
|
32
|
- Serves the story and the space – flow smooth between and within
scenes, entrances appropriate. Appropriate scope to the piece.
- Creative solutions to obstacles
in the presenting space (or inherent in the piece)
- Period and place appropriate.
Aids in defining the mood of the piece (reflects characters).
- Balances with other technical
elements (lights, costumes). Visual interest, style.
- Sight lines considered –
masking adequate as appropriate.
|
|
33
|
- Serves the set design and the story. Safe for the performers.
Facilitates scene changes (quiet, simple).
- Difficulty of design should be considered.
- Creative use of materials in creating the illusion of reality.
Attention to detail.
|
|
34
|
- Serves the set design and the story. Aids in setting place and time.
- Balance with other technical elements (lights, costumes).
- Degree of difficulty – large drops, intricate design, attention to
detail.
- Textures and colors appropriate. Creativity, artistry.
|
|
35
|
- Enhance and complement the set design and the story.
- Helps set place and period, also a reflects the characters or the
piece.
- Degree of difficulty – unusual demands of story or set design,
enhances reality.
|
|
36
|
- Enhance the storytelling – placement on stage, ease of use as
appropriate.
- Appropriate to time and place – authentic appearance
- Degree of difficulty – large numbers, unusual items.
|
|
37
|
- Enhance the story – creates time, place, mood.
- Creative use in defining space, aiding the flow of the piece.
- Degree of difficulty – area lights, specials, appropriate effects
(gobos, strobes, etc) blend into the overall storytelling without
drawing attention to themselves.
- Works in conjunction with set and costumes.
- Effective illumination of stage, actors (as appropriate). Shadows
intentional.
|
|
38
|
- Enhance the story – creates time, place, mood. Creative use in aiding
the flow of the piece.
- Amplification (if applicable) is natural sounding. For musicals:
seamless into and out of musical numbers. Orchestra balances with
singers.
- Degree of difficulty – sound effects blend into the overall
storytelling without drawing attention to themselves.
- Overcame obstacles inherent in presenting space or piece itself (large
tap numbers on a hollow stage).
|
|
39
|
- Serve the story – consistent and appropriate period. Compliment the
action. Ease of performance.
- Color palette works with set and lights.
- Degree of difficulty – unusual period, large cast, many costume
changes. Authenticity.
|
|
40
|
- Serves the story – aids projection of character. Style is accurate to
period and consistent.
- Consistent with costumes and make-up.
- Wigs are appropriate to story and stay secure throughout.
- Degree of difficulty – specialty wigs, large casts, style changes
(aging characters during the production)
|
|
41
|
- Serves the story – aids projection of character. Accurate to period
and consistent.
- Incorporates six key elements of character analysis – HEARTH
(Heredity; Environment – occupation, geography, etc; Age; Race;
Temperament – personality, emotional state; and Health)
- Consistent with costumes and lights.
- Degree of difficulty – specialty makeup, large casts, makeup changes
(aging characters during the production)
|
|
42
|
- Creative and appropriate use (not gratuitous) in serving the story.
- Ease of use by performers (if applicable).
- Degree of difficulty – large or unusual effects.
- FAQ – Define Special Effects- particularly if not “specified in
program”.
- Was it an effect that would have required a “special dedicated
technician” to setup and/or run?
- Pyro, Special Rigging (Peter Pan), Rain, Video Effects
|
|
43
|
- Again, remember, when considering overall production elements, each
element should:
- Serve the story being told
- Be appropriate to the piece and the presenting space (in context of
director’s vision)
- Be of consistent quality throughout the piece
- With the following considerations for each specific element
|
|
44
|
- Effective storytelling. Continuity, pace, blocking.
- Blending of technical elements. Effective use of the presenting space.
- Vision/concept clear to cast and designers, then presented to audience
as a cohesive whole. Commitment to this vision evident.
- Appropriate casting.
- For musicals: seamless songs and dances in the piece as the story is
being told.
|
|
45
|
- Music serves the story – seamless from scenes into songs; sensitive to
the theatrical aspects of the music; appropriate use of scene change
music; tempos appropriate to flow and pace of the production
- Degree of difficulty – consider the music, orchestrations, vocals;
large chorus, difficult harmonies
- Vocal – consider intonation, harmonies, diction, phrasing, rhythm,
style, integrity to score
- Orchestra – balance and blend between sections, balance with singers,
scale is appropriate to the piece and the space, intonation within and
between sections, integrity to the score
|
|
46
|
- Dance serves the story and is appropriate to the music.
- Degree of difficulty – should be considered – large production
numbers, many numbers, intricate styles (dream ballets, tap, Fosse),
creativity and variety of styles, integrity to the score (large cuts?)
- Composition – appropriate steps, formation work, transitions between
formations as well as into and out of dances; style consistent and
appropriate to the piece; overall flow within numbers as well is in
the piece
- Execution – clean, appropriate to level of performers, considerate of
singing and acting while dancing
|
|
47
|
- Action serves the story – fits the tone of the scene and motivation of
the characters, weapon choice is appropriate to the period/setting.
- Degree of difficulty should be considered – large ensembles, intricate
movements, variety of styles. Safety of both performers and audience
considered. Taught by certified individual (SAFD actor/combatant).
- Natural transitions, realistic movements and reactions. Convincing.
- Execution – clean, appropriate to level of performers, considerate of
singing and acting while fighting.
|
|
48
|
- Story told effectively, blending of technical elements and performance
elements (continuity, flow, pace appropriate). Impact of the piece
overall.
- Production challenges (degree of difficulty) should be considered
(think Fantastiks vs. Follies, or Love Letters vs. Noises Off).
|
|
49
|
- The awards are presented for “outstanding achievement,” not for
“best”. If you keep this in mind,
it makes your job easier.
- Remain true to your personal experience in theater.
- What is average to you?
- Remain consistent. Stay true to your “5” throughout the season and the
system will work to present an award to a deserving nominee for their
outstanding work. Don’t adjust your scoring, because you feel you were
too easy early or too critical early.
- It is okay if your highest score is a “5” throughout the year.
- If you are an adjudicator for another theater awards program, please
be sure to use the WATCH criteria when filling out a WATCH ballot.
- Judge the production you see based on its own merits, not on
expectations or historical reference of a company or artist.
- Don’t try to rank the ten shows you saw. Judge everything based on its own
merits against your own experience in community theater.
|
|
50
|
- A sample ballot has been provided.
- If you run out of ballots, you can download and print a ballot from the
website (washingtontheater.org) as is the mailing address for
tabulation.
- Please fill out your ballot completely and send it as soon as possible
after seeing the show. (10 days maximum)
- Always keep a photocopy of your ballot.
Several have gone missing in the mail.
- E-mail your rep and the adjudication coordinator to let them know you
saw the show.
|
|
51
|
- Your scores will not be divulged to anyone in any context. No feedback is being provided to the
theaters or productions.
- Some people have asked us to consider providing a “composite score” to
each element, but the board has continued to reject this request,
believing it would only serve to undermine the WATCH mission.
- Please do not talk about your scores with anyone.
- You don’t know who is listening.
People will know you are a judge and they will be listening.
- You are not restricted from talking to members of the production about
your likes and dislikes, so long as that conversation does not
influence the scores you would give.
- For example, if you did not understand the director’s vision while
watching the show, but it was explained afterward and it becomes clear
you must score it as if it had not been explained to you.
|
|
52
|
- Scoring Performances
- PLEASE list the cast in the same order as provided in the playbill.
- If there is a “character name” please list them on the ballot even if
they were “not identifiable” on stage.
- You do not need to list “groups” or “choruses”
- Not every munchkin in the chorus needs to be scored, but Mayor of the
Munchkins would be.
|
|
53
|
- Scoring Performances
- How to deal with “one actor” performing “multiple characters”.
- The rule is “go with the playbill”
- If all characters performed by an actor are listed together, then list
it that way on the ballot and give one score.
- If the actor’s name appears next to several separate characters, then
list each character on a separate line and score each.
|
|
54
|
- Scoring Performances
- How to deal with “multiple actors” performing “one character”.
- We have had circumstances where two actors split performances for
various reasons (understudy, emergency etc.)
- Score the performance you saw.
The ballots will be tabulated as if only one person performed
that character and any “special arrangements” would be made if
required during tabulation should the performance get a nomination or
award.
|
|
55
|
- Scoring Performances
- What is the scale?
- 1 to 10, 10 is the highest. Whole numbers only.
- 10 – Excellent/Highest Possible Quality
- 9 – Outstanding/Remarkably High Quality
- 8 – Superior/Remarkably Above Average
- 7 – Noticeably above average
- 6 – Slightly above average
- 5 – Average
- 4 – Fair
- 3 – Noticeably below average
- 2 – Poor
- 1 – Did not meet criteria
- N/I – Not identifiable
|
|
56
|
- Scoring Performances
- Based on the criteria
- Based on your experience
- Score performances in the context of what is “average” to you.
- Don’t be afraid to give a 1 or a 10 if you feel it deserves it.
- And if you can’t identify someone, circle N/I for “not
identifiable”. But, list them on
the ballot if they had a character name.
|
|
57
|
- Also on the ballot…
- You will be asked to circle the sex of each actor (regardless of the
character they portrayed)
- Circle “L” for all actors in Lead Roles:
- What is a lead role:
- Who the story is about or whose presence is primary to the piece.
- NOTE: There may be multiple leads by gender or none at all –
depending on the piece.
|
|
58
|
- Circle “C” for ALL actors in Cameo Roles:
- What is a cameo?
- A small but very memorable performances by an performer with limited
stage time.
- For example: in a musical, the incidental character appearing in one
scene with a memorable song or production number; in a comedy, the
incidental character who appears in, and steals, a single scene; in a
drama, the incidental character who delivers a single pivotal
monologue. (e.g. Judi Dench’s performance as the Queen in
“Shakespeare in Love”)
- All Performances not designated as a lead or cameo are considered
“Featured Actors.”
|
|
59
|
- Why did we add the cameo award?
- The size of the featured category made it very difficult for a “very
small” role to be recognized for an award given the criteria and
“level of difficulty.”
- Only two awards will be presented, Cameo in a Musical and Cameo in a
Play. There will not be a
division of Actor or Actress.
|
|
60
|
- Scoring Technical Elements and Overall Production Elements
- Provide a score for every element, whether it is listed in the playbill
or not.
- If the play or musical does not have that element, circle N/A for Not
Applicable.
- For instance, plays do not usually have “Musical Directors” or
“Choreography”
- Many productions will not have stage combat or special effects.
- If the element exists, give it a score (even if it is not listed in the
playbill).
- Just because someone was omitted from the program, does not mean we
should overlook scoring their work.
|
|
61
|
- Scoring Technical and Overall Elements
- It is the same scale
- 1 to 10, 10 is the highest. Whole numbers only.
- 10 – Excellent/Highest Possible Quality
- 9 – Outstanding/Remarkably High Quality
- 8 – Superior/Remarkably Above Average
- 7 – Noticeably above average
- 6 – Slightly above average
- 5 – Average
- 4 – Fair
- 3 – Noticeably below average
- 2 – Poor
- 1 – Did not meet criteria
- N/A – Not applicable
|
|
62
|
- Scoring Technical and Overall Elements
- Based on the criteria
- Based on your experience
- Score these elements in the context of what is “average” to you.
- Don’t be afraid to give a 1 or a 10 if you feel it deserves it.
- EVERY ELEMENT should have a score or N/A circled.
- Adjudicate each element separately in accordance with the
criteria. Do not fall into the
trap of scoring all elements high or low based on the overall
production.
|
|
63
|
- Double-check that every line received a score on the performance,
technical and overall elements.
- Several ballots have arrived without an overall production score.
Please circle N/A or N/I for any elements that do not require a score.
- List “Your Company” in the upper right.
- Copy your ballot for your records.
- Copy the cast and crew list from the playbill and enclose it with your
ballot
- This is very useful in deciphering handwriting.
|
|
64
|
- Sign your ballot, put it in an envelope, affix postage and
- Send it to
- Margaret B. Binning
attn: WATCH
6042 Nancy Lane
Warrenton, VA 20187-4348
- Please keep your ballot copies until nominations are announced in
January, 2004.
- E-mail the adjudication coordinator and your company rep that you have
completed the assignment and sent your ballot.
|
|
65
|
- Do
- Make reservations early
- Stay true to your “5” throughout the season
- Send ballots promptly
- Keep copies of your ballots
- Give a 1 or a 10, if deserved.
- Mark all elements, even if it is “not identifiable” or “not applicable”
- Arrange for alternate judges early, if needed.
- Keep the Adjudication Coordinator and your company rep informed of your
status on fulfilling your commitment.
|
|
66
|
- Don’ts
- Don’t get frustrated with box office personnel
- Don’t leave a performance early
- Don’t be late to a performance
- Don’t base your scores on your feelings about “the script” or prior
association to performers or technicians. Score the production elements you
see, not past work or allow yourself to be offended by “the content”.
- Don’t score productions against each other, score them based on your
experience and standards.
|
|
67
|
- What about productions that are compilations of “one-acts”?
- For example “Plaza Suite” or “Actor’s Nightmare/Sister Mary Ignatius…”
- The rule is go with the playbill, if characters are listed separately
then give each a score.
- The real quandary is determining “leads.” Does a character that appeared in
one-act of a production constitute a leading role in the
production? We leave it to you
to weigh that in the context of the criteria. If seven of ten judges agree that the
character was a “lead” then it would be considered for the lead
category.
- A good rule of thumb, was the character principle to the story for at
least 2/3-3/4 of the “entire production.”
|
|
68
|
- The playbill lists “Guard #1 – John Doe”, “Guard #2 – Jane Doe”, “Guard
#3 – Jim Dough”, do I need to score them?
- Yes. Technically, “Guard #1” is
a distinguishing name. If you
cannot determine which guard is #1 or #2 or #3, then the score would be
“N/I” – not identifiable. In the
case of the musical “Shenandoah” there is a “Union Lt.” that has a very
moving song that not only warrants a score, but might be considered as
a “cameo” nominee.
- If they had been listed as “Guards – John Doe, Jane Doe and Jim Dough”
then you would NOT list them on the ballot.
|
|
69
|
- Training Sessions
- 11/3 (RCP), 11/10 (TTC), 11/14 (SMP), 11/17 (RLT)
- Encourage all judges to attend a training session
- Nominations Announced
- Evening of Sunday, January 19, 2003 at the Birchmere – FREE event
- 3rd Annual WATCH Awards Ceremony
- Sunday, March 2, 2003 at 7:00pm at The Birchmere. (tickets $12.50,
festival seating, doors open 5pm) – Jacket Requested
|
|
70
|
- What did we miss?
- What can we clarify?
|
|
71
|
- What’s New in 2003
- Judging
- Why you were selected
- Matrix of assignments
- E-mail and the Web
- Tickets and Reservations
- Using Alternates
- Adjudication Criteria
- The Ballot
- Where to send it.
- Do’s and Don’ts
- Special Circumstances
- Reminders and Dates
|